Hive Poker

Online Poker Traffic
& News Since 2006
PokerScout -- Online poker traffic rankings and news. January 16, 2018
49680 players

GameIntel Data Reports

Click here for more information about MPN (formerly Microgaming Network)

Note: Reviews claiming that poker sites are rigged (not dealing cards randomly or fairly) are hidden by default. Read the explanation for this and other review policies, or click here to see all reviews, including claims that MPN (formerly Microgaming Network) is rigged.

MPN (formerly Microgaming Network) has a weighted average rating of 4.6 out of 10 from a total of 47 reviewers

Note: The opinions expressed here are solely those of our readers. PokerScout does not review or endorse any poker sites.
Rating:1 / 10
Date:Sunday, January 8, 2017 closed without prior notification0 out of 0 readers found this review helpful
2017 and online poker in general still seems to be a shady business - so sad. has closed all of a sudden, cannot be contacted by any means and will therefore probably not refund player bankrolls.

This seriously requires legal action.
Was this review helpful?
Rating:9 / 10
Date:Thursday, November 22, 2012
Title:Good software and good action1 out of 2 readers found this review helpful
Really good action at the tables, impressed quite much by the amount of people playing there actually. Overall the experience is very good and compared to the big ones, it is pretty similar actually.

What I don't like is that the lobby is a bit cluttered and sometimes is hard to find the game you want to play, but after a while I got used.

Also very fast support and payments on 24hPoker, but not sure how it goes on others.
Was this review helpful?
Rating:7 / 10
Date:Wednesday, September 7, 2011
Title:good tournies19 out of 41 readers found this review helpful
I've been playing on Microgaming for years now with Gnuf.

I always liked the simplicity of it all, it's not the prettiest, but I play to play, not to look!

I play a mixture of tournies and cash. The tournies normally have quite big overlays, especially the €500k, so there's defo value there. The cash games are fairly decent, plenty of action at 1/2 NL. I've recently been playing on the anonymous tables, which are pretty good, as I know people won't be reading my stats, and have found that the games tend to be softer.

My only real gripe would be that there's not many 'massive' tournies like you find on Stars with huge prizepools. As a result, I mostly play my cash games on Gnuf and tournies on Stars.

Oh and those slagging off MG about the Eurolinx saga are plane silly. Why should MG have to pay off their debt? MG are merely the network provider. That's like asking a potatoe farmer to pay off debts of a closed down chip shop!

Was this review helpful?
Rating:4 / 10
Date:Sunday, June 14, 2009
Title:Buggy Software5 out of 11 readers found this review helpful
Very Buggy Software like the last reviewer said. It was unusable freezing up regularly, at least it was for the 2 weeks I tried to grind it out here in May.
Was this review helpful?
Rating:2 / 10
Date:Friday, June 3, 2011
Title:pathetic 2 out of 5 readers found this review helpful
even though micro is profitable i hate the mong reward scheme they have there
Was this review helpful?
Rating:10 / 10
Date:Friday, August 30, 2013
Title:best site1 out of 3 readers found this review helpful
No rigged software...flat 30% rakeback for all...
Was this review helpful?
Rating:9 / 10
Date:Thursday, July 29, 2010
Title:Microgaming!11 out of 28 readers found this review helpful
Microgaming software is some of the best software out there, I play on Unibet and have had no problems.
Was this review helpful?
Rating:8 / 10
Date:Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Title:MicroGaming isn't responsible8 out of 23 readers found this review helpful
I'm reading a lot of negative reviews about MicroGaming. Not because of the software, but because a few pokerrooms/casinos went under and MicroGaming didn't pay off the debts.

OF COURSE THEY DIDN'T! MicroGaming supplies the software. Nothing more. If some crooked company then uses this software and goes bankrupt, that doesn't mean MicroGaming is responsible. That's like saying MicroSoft is responsible when a PC-store goes bankrupt. Or saying that Apple is responsible when a music company goes bankrupt that offers it's music on iTunes.
Was this review helpful?
Rating:9 / 10
By:Prima Player
Date:Saturday, April 16, 2011
Title:Best software online5 out of 15 readers found this review helpful
For me, Prima has the best software online, better than P*, FTP and Party. But that's just my opinion. Cash outs are quite fast. You can find there plenty of fish.

The only thing I don't like here is the massive amount of short stacks, you have to open 50 BB min tables. They also introduced Anonymous tables recently, where you can't see players' screenname and therefore you can't use your HUD and notes, which sucks IMO.
Was this review helpful?
Rating:9 / 10
Date:Thursday, November 19, 2009
Title:2.2? Lets be serious6 out of 20 readers found this review helpful
I am not sure how people can judge a site based on the bad fortunes of one or 2 Operators.

Yes, Eurolinx had issues with withdrawals and some players may have lost their balances. However, the Microgaming Network is home to some other very large, and very safe Operators. Anybody heard of Unibet or Ladbrokes? or Doyle Brunson and his poker room (yes they have since left, but only because MGS deicided to pull out of the US)

I think their software is amoungst the best in the online world, if not the best. The lobby is easy to navigate, and there is always a cash game or tournament at the stakes I am looking to play.

Downtime is kept to a minimun, and is usually always scheduled, with fair notice being given to all players. While I cannot comment on the support for all the Operators who make up the Network, the room I play at provides assitance which is 2nd to none.

2.2? Do me a favour? give an MGS Operator a try.
Was this review helpful?

Page  1  2  3  4  5  

Copyright 2006-2018  All rights reserved.
Do not copy, redistribute or republish without prior written consent.